To Top

South Carolina lawsuit targets DraftKings Predictions, Polymarket over alleged illegal gambling

A South Carolina complaint alleges DraftKings Predictions and Polymarket offered unauthorized games of chance and collected winnings from illegal wagers on sports outcomes.
Tyler Andrews Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

A South Carolina attorney has filed a complaint against DraftKings Predictions and Polymarket, alleging the companies violated state gambling laws by offering unauthorized games of chance.

According to the complaint, attorney Jame M. Hughes of Motley Rice argues that prediction markets are gambling and that the defendants "incite and collect winnings from illegal wagers" placed by South Carolina residents on sporting event outcomes. The suit also claims the products are adding to a problem gambling epidemic.

Hughes said in a statement quoted by _GamblingNews_: “This lawsuit is premised on a straightforward thesis: The rhetorical set dressing of ‘prediction markets’ and event contracts doesn’t change reality.”

Complaint adds to pressure on prediction markets

The filing adds to broader scrutiny facing prediction-market operators in multiple states. The source report says the sector is under growing pressure in Washington, Michigan, and New York.

It also points to a separate New York lawsuit announced Friday against Kalshi. In that case, New York’s attorney general and the governor’s office are seeking $36 billion in alleged illegal proceeds and restitution to customers.

What is known, and what is not

The source report does not identify the court where the South Carolina complaint was filed, the exact filing date beyond saying it was filed last week, or the specific South Carolina statutes allegedly violated.

It also does not include a response from Polymarket or DraftKings Predictions.

For New York readers, the immediate significance is not a change to state law, but another example of how prediction markets are being challenged by plaintiffs and regulators who argue these products function as gambling. Any broader impact on operators, customers, or policy will depend on how these cases proceed.

Source: As reported by gamblingnews.com.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Tyler Andrews

Digital Content Strategist

Tyler Andrews has covered sports, art and entertainment in the US and abroad. He began his career covering Southern California sports before branching into the national sports market. He spent four years in Barcelona, covering FC Barcelona football as well as art and entertainment in the Catalan capital. Tyler, a Las Vegas native, is a graduate of both Cal State Long Beach and Chapman University. He currently resides in Dallas with his wife and family where, when he’s not chasing after his two daughters, he goes to concerts with his wife, collects comic books and roots for the Vegas Golden Knights.

VIEW ALL POSTS