To Top

DraftKings sues to block Philadelphia consumer-protection probe

DraftKings has gone to federal court to challenge Philadelphia’s consumer-protection ordinance after the city subpoenaed the company for information tied to gamblers, promotions, and bonus offers.
Tyler Andrews Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

DraftKings has filed a federal complaint challenging Philadelphia’s consumer-protection ordinance, arguing the city cannot use it to investigate or sue the sportsbook operator.

According to the complaint, Philadelphia sent DraftKings a subpoena in April seeking information about revenue from gamblers identified through analytics and other means, along with details about promotions and bonus offers. DraftKings is now asking the court to find the city’s ordinance unenforceable.

The company argues Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law gives public enforcement power to the state attorney general and district attorneys, not municipalities. In the complaint, DraftKings says, “The General Assembly vested public enforcement authority under the UTPCPL in the Attorney General and district attorneys acting in the name of the Commonwealth.” It adds: “It did not authorize municipalities to create parallel consumer protection enforcement agencies.”

Philadelphia’s Consumer Protection Ordinance was enacted in 2024 and allows Mayor Cherelle Parker to bring consumer-protection cases. DraftKings also argues the local law conflicts with the First Class City Home Rule Act and interferes with the authority of state gaming regulators.

Philadelphia has defended the ordinance in other litigation. City lawyers have argued that “the CPO provides a complementary, additional means to further the purpose of the UTPCPL within Philadelphia.”

The dispute matters beyond this one case because Philadelphia has already used the ordinance in lawsuits involving pharmacy benefits managers over opioids, S.C. Johnson & Son over Ziploc bag recyclability, and Glock. Other defendants have also challenged the law, and those arguments are still pending before Judge Gerald Pappert.

For DraftKings users, the immediate takeaway is procedural: this filing is about who has authority to police alleged consumer-protection violations, not a ruling on the merits of any claim against the operator. The source report did not say what specific claims Philadelphia may ultimately try to bring against DraftKings, and no outcome has been reported yet.

Source: As reported by Black Chronicle News Service.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Tyler Andrews

Digital Content Strategist

Tyler Andrews has covered sports, art and entertainment in the US and abroad. He began his career covering Southern California sports before branching into the national sports market. He spent four years in Barcelona, covering FC Barcelona football as well as art and entertainment in the Catalan capital. Tyler, a Las Vegas native, is a graduate of both Cal State Long Beach and Chapman University. He currently resides in Dallas with his wife and family where, when he’s not chasing after his two daughters, he goes to concerts with his wife, collects comic books and roots for the Vegas Golden Knights.

VIEW ALL POSTS