Share 
A House Agriculture subcommittee has opened a new front in the debate over sports event contracts, with Chairman Rep. Dusty Johnson saying Congress should not stay silent on the issue and indicating more hearings are likely.
The hearing focused on consumer protections and market integrity in sports event prediction markets, which have drawn growing criticism from state-regulated gaming interests and tribal stakeholders. For online sportsbook players, the dispute matters because it could shape whether these products continue under federal commodities oversight, face tighter restrictions, or are treated more like traditional sports betting.
Johnson said the hearing was not the last word from Congress. "I do not believe that this committee, that Congress should be silent," he said.
Five witnesses testified over more than two hours, laying out sharply different views on whether the Commodity Futures Trading Commission already has authority over these contracts.
Robert A. Schwartz argued Congress has already given the CFTC that power and said lawmakers should amend the Commodity Exchange Act if they want to prohibit sports event contracts. Carl Kennedy said prediction markets can coexist with state-regulated sportsbooks and argued consumers should be able to choose between products.
Others pushed back hard. Chris Cylke of the American Gaming Association said the contracts "function as sports wagers in every meaningful sense" while operating outside state and tribal regulatory systems. David Bean of the Indian Gaming Association said the current approach undermines tribal and state sovereignty.
Rep. Jill Tokuda also questioned how the products fit in the 11 states that have not legalized sports betting, saying, "This is gambling. It’s gambling."
Another issue was whether the CFTC has the staff to police the market effectively. Testimony cited an approximate 20% reduction in agency staffing since 2020. Witnesses also discussed the CFTC review process for self-certified contracts, including 23 core principles, a 10-day window to open a public-interest review, and a defined 90-day review process.
What happens next remains unclear. The hearing surfaced several possible paths: Congress could leave the current framework in place, give the CFTC more resources, or move to restrict or ban sports event contracts through legislation. For now, the main takeaway is that federal scrutiny is increasing, and the issue is likely to return to Capitol Hill soon.
—
Source: As reported by sportsbettingdime.com.
