To Top
PlayNetwork Independent US gambling guides · state by state You're on PlayNY

CFTC proposal could sharpen line between prediction markets and gambling

The CFTC has proposed defining sports, politics, cultural-event and weather contracts as swaps under federal commodities law, while separately saying sportsbook wagers and casino games are not swaps.
Tyler Andrews Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is proposing a clearer federal line between prediction-market contracts and traditional gambling products, a move that could matter in legal fights involving sports-event contracts and New York’s case against Polymarket.

On Oct. 9, the CFTC issued two measures. One would expressly define event contracts tied to sports, politics, cultural events, and weather as swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act. The other, an interim final rule, says casino-style gambling products — including sportsbook wagers and casino games — are not swaps. Both measures carry 30-day comment periods.

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said those event contracts are financial instruments used to hedge, speculate, and generate information about future outcomes, placing them “squarely within the CFTC’s regulatory remit.”

What the CFTC is trying to separate

The agency’s approach is aimed at preserving state authority over conventional gambling while reinforcing its position that federally regulated event contracts fall under federal law.

That distinction has been at the center of ongoing court disputes. In September, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said Kalshi had not shown that its sports contracts qualify as swaps, and rejected the company’s request to block Ohio and Tennessee from enforcing gambling laws.

A separate Third Circuit decision was more favorable to Kalshi in its dispute with New Jersey, and New Jersey has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review that ruling. The NFL also filed an amicus brief in the New Jersey case arguing that sports-outcome contracts are wagers, not swaps entitled to exclusive federal regulation.

Why New York readers should watch it

New York has accused Polymarket of operating an illegal gambling business. Polymarket has countersued, arguing that federal commodities law preempts state enforcement.

The CFTC’s proposed framework does not resolve that dispute on its own, but it adds a clearer statement of how the federal regulator views these products: certain event contracts may fall within federal derivatives law, while sportsbook bets and casino games do not.

For New York readers, the key near-term date is the 30-day public comment period attached to both CFTC actions. After that, the biggest open questions are whether the agency finalizes the measures as written, how courts treat that interpretation, and whether the Supreme Court takes up any of the related cases.

—

Source: As reported by financefeeds.com.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Tyler Andrews

Digital Content Strategist

Tyler Andrews has covered sports, art and entertainment in the US and abroad. He began his career covering Southern California sports before branching into the national sports market. He spent four years in Barcelona, covering FC Barcelona football as well as art and entertainment in the Catalan capital. Tyler, a Las Vegas native, is a graduate of both Cal State Long Beach and Chapman University. He currently resides in Dallas with his wife and family where, when he’s not chasing after his two daughters, he goes to concerts with his wife, collects comic books and roots for the Vegas Golden Knights.

VIEW ALL POSTS